Posts Tagged ‘current affairs pakistan’
December 21, 2009
American Neutrality is Boston Globe’s recommendation for U.S. policymakers as political uncertainty looms over Pakistan with last weeks repeal of the National Reconciliation Ordinance, effectively revoking Amnesty from corruption charges on thousands of government officials. Although political transition appears imminent in 2010 and comes as President Obama commits to an Af-Pak troop surge, effectively stepping up our engagement with Islamabad, the Boston Globe’s call for neutrality is wise given the current pool of potential leaders to choose from:
- Nawaaz Sharif:
- Reason We Should Remain Neutral – Quite simply: “After two terms as prime minister, he’s remembered for rampant corruption, nuclear proliferation, and his penchant for cozying up to Islamist militants“
- Pervez Musharraf or Asif Zardari:
- Reason We Should Remain Neutral – Well: “at the behest of Washington, General Pervez Musharraf, who was president at the time, arranged the amnesty that allowed Zardari and his wife, Benazir Bhutto, to return from exile so she could lead her Pakistan Peoples Party in elections. Bhutto was assassinated, and her husband became prime minister. Not without reason, many Pakistanis who are angry about Zardari’s corruption and ineffectiveness hold the United States responsible for imposing him on their country”
- Pakistan Military:
- Reason We Should Remain Neutral – Perpetuating rampant blame that one too many American backed military dictators have prevented democracy from ever taking root in Pakistan can’t help growing weariness of cooperation with our government.
- Noteworthy example – Backing General Zia-ul-Haq in the 1980’s with his leadership key to training the Mujahideen (now known as Al Qaeda) to oust the Soviets from Afghanistan. Not coincidentally, Zia’s regime is remembered as the time Pakistan shifted from being a socially progressive, and moderate Islamic state, to imposing severe, fundamentalist religious policy reforms.
- Chief Justice Iftekhar Chaudhry:
- Reason We Should Remain Neutral: Under a sugar-coated banner of “democracy”, the Chief Justice is too blatantly partisan for us to support. His recent decision to repeal the National Reconciliation Ordinance, which set wheels in motion for regime change is widely understood as nothing short of a ploy for power and done in the politics of retribution.
This leaves neutrality as not only our most wise option, but also perhaps our most ethical route. Restraint in supporting any particular regime could mean history points one less finger in our direction should anything go less than perfect as we deepen involvement in Af-Pak. Simultaneously, neutrality assures Pakistani masses who are increasingly skeptical of cooperation with the United States that they have 100% autonomy in political processes.
Well publicized neutrality on a looming regime change could be a valuable opportunity to demonstrate a genuine interest in Pakistan as they transform politically and we require their support in the War on Terror.
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED @
Posted in Current Affairs, Foreign Policy, International Affairs, International Relations, Pakistan, U.S. Politics, US Foreign Polciy, US Pakistan relations | Tagged 2010 pakistan, 2010 pakistan politics, af-pak, af-pak region, af-pak strategic, af-pak war, af-pak war on terror, american neutrality pakistan, american pakistan relations, asif ali zardari, Asif Zardari, asif zardari pakistan NRO, asif zardari supreme court, chaudhry chief justice, chief justice chaudry, chief justice in pakistan, chief justice nro pakistan, chief justice of pakistan, chief justice pakistan, current affairs pakistan, genearal zia united states, General Musharraf, general zia pakistan, general zia united states, iftekhar chaudry, iftikhar chaudhry, international affairs in pakistan, International Affairs Pakistan, international politics pakistan, international relations pakistan, jeewanjee, jeewanjee politics, justice chaudhry, justice chaudry, kerry lugar bill, kerry lugar bill pakistan, mujahideen zia, musharraf pakistan, musharraf zardari, muslim world, muslims pakistan, national reconciliation ordinance, national reconciliation ordinance pakistan, nawaaz sharif, nawaaz sharif corruption, nawaz sharif corruption, nawaz sharif corruption prime minister, neutrality pakistan, news on pakistan, NRO court zardari, NRO pakistan, NRO pakistan court, NRO ruling, NRO supreme court, NRO supreme court pakistan, NRO unconstitutional, NRO unconstitutional pakistan, NRO zardari, NRO zardari pakistan, organization of islamic conference pakistan, pakistan 2010 prediction, pakistan 2010 recommendation, pakistan affairs., pakistan foreign policy, pakistan foreign policy association united states, pakistan international, Pakistan international affairs, pakistan international politics, pakistan musharraf, pakistan needs economic development, pakistan news, pakistan next year, pakistan policy, pakistan politiacal affairs, pakistan political, pakistan political affairs, pakistan politics, pakistan politics asif zardari, pakistan united states afghanistan, Pakistan US cooperation, Pakistan war on terror, pakistani affairs, pakistani policies, pakistani political affairs, pakistani politics, pakistani poltiis, pakistani us relations, pervez musharraf pakistan, politics in pakistan, politics of pakistan, president obama pakistan strategy, prime minister jaswant singh, prime minister nawaz sharif, prime minister sharif, supreme court pakistan zardari, terrorism afghanistan pakistan, terrorism of pakistan, the af-pak region, the af-pak war, united states assistance pakistan, United states foreign policy pakistan, united states pakistan cooperation, united states pakistan policies, united states pakistan relations, united states zia ul haq, us assistance to pakistan, US foreign policy, US foreign policy to pakistan, us led war on terror, us led war on terror pakistan, us neutrality pakistan, US Pakistan relations, us winning hearts and minds, war on terror in pakistan, war on terror united states pakistan, zainab jeewanjee, zainab jeewanjee foreign policy, zainab jeewanjee internation, zainab jeewanjee international affairs, zainab jeewanjee international relations, zainab jeewanjee Pakistan, Zainab jeewanjee politics, zainab politics, zainyjee, zardari corruption, zardari nro, zia pakistan islamization, zia pakistan radical islam, zia ul haq pakistan | 2 Comments »
November 1, 2009
Zainab Interviews the Honorary Sharifuddin Pirzada
Q & A BREAKDOWN
PAST LEADERS: Jinnah
- 2:39 – 3:17 – Former BJP Parliamentarian Jaswant Singh authored a book on Jinnah that is receiving a lot of controversy, having actually worked with Jinnah, can you share your thoughts on the book ?
- 3:20 – 4:42 – In recent interviews, Singh has said Muslims in India are “robbed of their psychological security” and basically downtrodden. He says what Jinnah should have done is left some advice for Indian Muslims who stayed back and didn’t migrate to Pakistan after partition, what do you think Jinnah might have said?
- 4:44-6:01 – He also refers to Jinnah as a “nationalist” not at all Anti-Indian, please expand
- 6:01-7:34 – Referring to politics, when Jinnah split from the Congress party eventually formulating a two state idea later in his career, were there any politics referring to Nehru or Gandhi that had an impact on decision making? Jaswant Singh makes a mention to some, what does your experience tell us?
- 7:35: – 8:15 – You’ve mentioned previously that Jinnah was a self made man, more details?
- 8:15 – 8:55 : Tell us about your experience with Jinnah, its a rare treat for us to have your insight
- 8: 55 – 9:22 – Further details, conclusion on Jinnah.
“Jinnah had the Charm of Churchill, Dignity of de Gaulle, Magnetism of Mandela, and Objectivity of Obama”
CURRENT LEADERS : Musharraf
- 9:23 – 10:47 – Shifting to current leaders now, lets talk about Musharraf. You’ve got great experience, tell us about your work with the former General and Leader of Pakistan.
- 10:48 – 11:55 – How did your work with Musharraf expand during his tenure?
- 12:56 – 13:45 – You served on the national security council & as senior advisor to Gen. Musharraf, tell us howthe context of national security in Pakistan changed after 9/11. Specifically what came on the agenda, what were the immediate concerns and interests and what drove the decision to behave the way Pakistan did at the time?
- 13:45 – 15:48 – Recent polls indicate a majority of pakistanis think Musharraf should be punished for treason as per laws under article 6 of the Constitution, how do you feel about that?
- 15:48 – 14:55 – Do you think it’s a valid case that Musharraf be tried for treason?
- 14:54 – 15:38 – Regarding an increasingly free media in Pakistan, please offer further insight
- 15:38 – 16:16 – There’s a contention that the currently free media be attributed to Benazir Bhutto’s regime wherein sateilite technology allowing expanded media was put in place, while others assign credit to Musharraf. Can you clarify this?
- 16:16 – 18:39 – Do you think it was the state of emergency and sacking of the judiciary that caused Musharraf to lose elections?
- 18:42 – 19:35 – Final question on Musharraf, what do you think his legacy would be?
“The Media is very free in Pakistan, and Musharraf is to be given a great deal of credit for that”
CURRENT LEADERS : Zardari
- 19:48 – 20:55 – Recent military achievements in SWAT and international trade deals penned by Zardari paint a somewhat rosy picture for the future, what are your thoughts on him so far?
US – PAKISTAN RELATIONS:
- 20:57 – 23:14 – There’s a US special envoy in the region, drone attacks continue, the west is pushing for rapid democratization and are heavily investing in counterterrorism through cooperation with Pakistan while Islamabad hopes to secure itself and expand economically in this engagement. But there’s a long history of cooperation but still a lot of skepticism on both sides, do you think current engagement with a new administration who promises more diplomacy will yield different results than we’ve seen in this alliance?
- 23:14 – 24:52 – What advice might you offer President Obama or the State department in terms of engaging Pakistan?
“Pakistan was member of SEATO and CENTO but certain conditions were not fulfilled and there is a strong section of Pakistan who has reservations with a cordial relationship with the United States”
PAKISTAN & THE MUSLIM WORLD
- 24:55 – 25:11 – Your position at the Organization of Islamic Conference?
- 25:13 – 25:57 – On the Israeli Palestinian issue, how do you assess the current two state solution that Obama has put forward? How viable is it?
- 25:57 – 26:25 – What is Pakistan’s diplomatic/official stance on the Israeli Palestinian Issue?e Islamic Conference
- 12:25 – 26:35 – What are the main priorities of the Organization of the Islamic Conference?
“The Palestinian Issue followed by Kashmir are of top priority to the Organization of Islamic Conference”
PAKISTAN BORDER RELATIONS : INDIA & AFGHANISTAN:
- 26:35 – 27:42 – Manmohan Singh & Prime Minister Gilani at the NAAM summit this summer agreed to bracket issues of Terrorism and move forward on peace talks and trade issues. Such rhetoric is not new, and might not reach fruition, so do you see anything being resolved in Kashmir anytime soon, without the help of the US?
- 27:44 – 28:44 – Elections in Afghanistan are being contested between Abdullah Abdullah and incumbent Karzai. Pakistan doesn’t seem keen on either because both signal a warming of relations between Kabul & New Delhi which is believed to come at a direct expense to Islamabad. How do you feel about that?
America can facilitate peace talks between India and Pakistan on Kashmir, but on the whole, people of Kashmir are still suffering and struggling. The approach of prime ministers has been positive, but an extremist element in India exists which doesn’t want this. To stop suffering in Kashmir, a solution must be reached.
PAKISTAN’S INTERNATIONAL FUTURE:
- 28:44 – How do you see geopolitics playing out in the next decade for Pakistan, given amplified US presence, including super embassies being constructed in Pakistan/Afghanistan, perpetually stalled relations with India, a very likely nuclear neighbor in Iran, and increasingly influential China and polarized Russia, what does Pakistan look like ten years from now?
“Pakistan in the next ten years must concentrate on democratic set up, economic development & maintaining cordial relatoins with Islamic countries. There are two great friends of Pakistan: Saudi Arabia, the other is China. That’s a good starting point”
Posted in Current Affairs, Foreign Policy, India Pakistan, International Affairs, International Relations, Pakistan, South Asia, US Pakistan relations | Tagged af-pak war, afghanistan pakistan war on terror, akistan, american pakistan relations, current affairs pakistan, democracy pakistan, gandhi jinnah, gandhi partition jinnah, General Musharraf, International Affairs, International Affairs Pakistan, jijnnah partition, jinnah democracy, jinnah democratic, jinnah freedom, jinnah gandhi, jinnah pakistan, jinnah pakistan democracy, jinnah pakistan freedom, jinnah politician, jinnah politics, kerry lugar bill, kerry lugar bill pakistan, latest news pakistan, minnah democratic pakistan, mohammad ali jinnah, musharraf pakistan, muslim world, muslims pakistan, news on pakistan, organization of islamic conference pakistan, pakistan afghanistan, pakistan current affairs, Pakistan economy, Pakistan international affairs, pakistan international politics, pakistan musharraf, pakistan news, pakistan politics, pakistan terrorism, Pakistan terrorists, pakistan us assistance, Pakistan US cooperation, Pakistan war on terror, pakistani affairs, pakistani politics, pakistani us relations, partition pakistan, pervez musharraf pakistan, politician pakistan, politics in pakistan, Sharefuddin Pirzada, united states assistance pakistan, united states pakistan cooperation, us assistance to pakistan, US foreign policy, US foreign policy to pakistan, US Pakistan relations, war on terror, war on terror pakistan, zainab jeewanjee, zainab politics, zainyjee.wordpress.com | 7 Comments »
October 15, 2009
What happens when a majority of one country’s citizens opt for martial law but the democratically elected government in power including judicial, executive and legislative branches are against a military takeover? It’s quite the political conundrum because either side offers legitimate democratic authority, but they’re diametrically opposed. A rational answer is to let the democratically elected government fulfill it’s term and allow citizens to elect politicians to office who will support martial law in the next term. That might work in a fully functional democracy backed by institutions that can uphold legitimacy and granted the state is sufficiently secure. However, in light of decreasing security, severe economic downturns and age old skepticism of U.S. actions in Pakistan, ever so gradually the country shifts it’s gaze toward the military.
Decreasing Security :: To offer partial explanation in a nutshell: Since 2001, terrorists fleeing Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, spilled over into Pakistan at the nebulous northern border areas which are historically autonomous from federal regulation. The fact that Pakistan already housed one of the worlds largest refugee populations allowed this spillover a massive and destitute demographic from which to exploit support. As a result, we now see unprecedented terrorism in Pakistan where Al Qaeda and the Taliban had no significant presence prior to 9/11.
Skepticism of U.S.’s Role in Pakistan :: Since the inception of Pakistan in 1947, bilateral realations with the United States have been defined by cooperation wherein Pakistan served as a proxy for U.S. Containment throughout the Cold War (i.e. security pacts like SEATO, CENTCOM, then aiding our Afghan led defense against Soviet incursions in the 1980’s). In exchange, Pakistan’s military with U.S. support, bolstered itself as the strongest, most efficient and stable institution in Pakistan. Some argue civilian governments and democratic institutions were thus never given an opportunity to compete with such a well funded, strongly backed military. And therein we find multifaceted dimensions that help explain the controversy over current U.S. support of Pakistan. Former Pakistan to U.S. ambassador Maleeha Lodhi describes the Kerry Lugar bill:
“the offending part of the legislation sets up the country as hired help and puts the military in the dock, presumed guilty on many counts and having to prove its innocence to Washington”
Pakistan is “hired help”, that’s the crux of skepticism on the Kerry-Lugar bill. Concern is rooted in a long history of cooperation with the United States that some argue created a behemoth military institution costing them a fair chance at democracy. In attempt to address that very concern, the Kerry Lugar bill mentions no military aid in exchange for cooperation on the War on Terror, unlike previous assistance packages from the Cold War. Ironically, bleak affairs in Pakistan now which are partially a result of pervious cooperation, particularly during the Soviet Afhgan war, prompt arguments that the military is exactly what needs support right now. Thus, the Lugar Bill receives not only skepticism from Pakistan’s strongest institution, but increasingly the public.
Although Secretary Clinton and Senators Kerry and Lugar have made no indication of altering the bill, to avoid future skepticism and potential resentment of U.S. involvement in Pakistan it could be wise to make changes so as to not sideline the military at this critical period in our War on Terror. Unlike previous Republican presidencies, the Obama administration is committed to dealing with civilian governments in Pakistan. It’s a noble idea and even though i don’t suspect that as the military gains legitimacy the civilian government will collapse soon, we should think twice before riling such concern over a bill that has just a 5 year life span. Central and South Asia are critical regions for our interests and we may need to engage strategically positioned Pakistan in more years to come. So a backlash by the most powerful institution in that country is something we should anticipate, and work actively against.
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED @
Posted in Pakistan | Tagged Afghan war, afghanistan cold war, afghanistan pakistan border, afghanistan soviet war, afghanistan war on terror, Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda Pakistan, ambassador lodhi, america pakistan, america pakistan politics, america pakistan relations, american pakistani relations, american politics pakistan, biden lugar act, biden lugar bill, biden lugar pakistan, cold war pakistan, Current Affairs, current affairs pakistan, democracy in pakistan, democracy pakistan, democratic pakistan, dick lugar pakistan, enhanced cooperation pakistan act, enhanced cooperation with pakistan act, foreign policy pakistan, foreign policy to pakistan, International Affairs, international affairs in pakistan, international affairs of pakistan, International Affairs Pakistan, international current affairs, international current affairs pakistan, international pakistan politics, international politics, jeewanjee, jeewanjee politics, kerry lugar act, kerry lugar bill, kerry lugar legislation, kerry lugar pakistan bill, kerry lugar pakistan congress, kerry pakistan, Maleeha Lodhi, martial law in pakistan, martial law pakistan, military in pakistan politics, military of pakistan, military politics pakistan, Pakistan, pakistan afghanistan, pakistan afghanistan cold war, pakistan america, pakistan american affairs, pakistan bill, Pakistan democracy, Pakistan economy, pakistan history, Pakistan international affairs, pakistan international relations, pakistan martial law, pakistan military, pakistan politics, pakistan security, pakistan soviet afghan war, pakistan us war on terror, Pakistani ambassador US, pakistani foreign policy, pakistani politics, politicians pakistan, politics of pakistan, politics us pakistan, senator kerry pakistan, soviet war afghanistan, soviet war in afghanistan, Taliban, taliban in pakistan, US foreign policy to pakistan, US maleeha lodhi, us pakistan affairs, US pakistan ambassador, us pakistan politics, US Pakistan relations, us pakistan relationship, us policy for pakistan, US role in pakistan, war on terror america pakistan, war on terror pakistan, zainab jeewanjee, Zainab jeewanjee politics, zainab politics | 12 Comments »